1
Associate Professor at Shahid Beheshti University
2
Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University
10.29252/piaj.2022.210002.0
Abstract
This study is going to analyze the productive power of Foucault from a discursive viewpoint and investigate its role in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In Foucault’s view, the productivity of power is the form of making establishment. Foucault equals power with act and practice; so, he places power analyses instead of power theory. Once power produces knowledge and discourse, it can be turned to practice. In fact, without establishing truth regime, that is discourse, power cannot be crystalized in practice. Power can become subjugation, domination, normalization or the Hegemone power of life. It makes discourse in order to create subject and object. Implementing this policy in the postmodern era requires power, knowledge and exercising a Hegemone discourse for establishing a truth regime in the international system. This study is going to answer the question that how Iran’s foreign policy could efficiently use power and discourse in an optimal way to reach its maximal interests? The recognition of the power and knowledge relations in this era, discourse applying the genealogy and archeology elements and the understanding of Michel Foucault of discourse is what this writing is organized around.
نش، کیت (1392)، جامعه شناسی سیاسی معاصر جهانی شدن، سیاست و قدرت، ترجمه محمد تقی دلفروز با مقدمه دکتر حسین بشیریه، تهران: کویر.
نوروزی، نورمحمد (1382)، تحول گفتمان سیاسی و پویش الگوی رفتار سیاست خارجی در ایران، رساله، دانشگاه تهران. دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی.
وندایک، تئون (1389)، مطالعاتی در تحلیل گفتمان: از دستور متن تا گفتمانکاوی انتقادی، چاپ سوم، ترجمه: گروه مترجمان، تهران: دفتر مطالعات و توسعه رسانه.
Abeysekara, Ananda (2008), The Politics of Postsecular Religion: Mourning Secular Futures, New York: Columbia University Press.
Carrette, Jeremy R (1999), Foucault and religion, London/ New York: Routlege.
Colebrook, Claire (1997), New Literary Histories: New Historicism and Contemporary Criticism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Durepos, Gabrielle A. T. and Albert J. Mills (2012), ANTiHistory: Theorizing the Past, History, and Historiography in Management and Organization Studies, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, INC.
Foucault, Michel (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge, Translated by Alan Sheridan, London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel (1995), Discipline and Punishment, Translated by Alan Sheridan, New York, Random House.
Giannachi, Gabriella (2016), Archive Everything: Mapping the Everyday, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Huffer, Lynne (2013), Are the Lips a Grave? A Queer Feminist on the Ethics of Sex, New York: Columbia University Press.
Jardine, Gail McNicol (2010), Foucault & Education, New York: Peter Lang.
Katzman, Kenneth & Kerr, K. Paul (2016), "Iran Nuclear Agreement", Congressional Research Service. CRS.
Loewenthal, Del and Robert Snell (2003), Post-modernism for Psychotherapists: A Critical Reader, Hove and New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Pinto, Henrique (2003), Foucault, Christianity and Interfaith Dialogue, New York: Routledge.
Poster, M. & Michel Foucault (1990), “Marxism & History”. Cambridge, Polity press.
Prado, C.G. (ed.) (2009), Foucault's Legacy, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Sembou, Evangelia (2015), Hegel's Phenomenology and Foucault's Genealogy, New York: Routledge.
Sharpe, Alex (2010), Foucault's Monsters and the Challenge of Law, New York: Routledge.
Spanos, William V. (2009), The Legacy of Edward W. Said, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Visker, Rudi (1995), Michel Foucault: Genealogy as Critique, trans. by Chris Turner, London/ New York: Verso.
Wuthnow, Robert, James Davison Hunter, Albert J. Bergesen, Edith Kurzweil (2010), Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault, and Jurgen Habermas, Vol 5, New York: Routledge.
Tajik, M., & Rezazadeh, K. (2022). Focauldian Productive Power from a Discursive View(Case Study: Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Political and International Approaches, 13(4), 93-123. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.210002.0
MLA
Mohammadreza Tajik; Khosrow Rezazadeh. "Focauldian Productive Power from a Discursive View(Case Study: Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran)", Political and International Approaches, 13, 4, 2022, 93-123. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.210002.0
HARVARD
Tajik, M., Rezazadeh, K. (2022). 'Focauldian Productive Power from a Discursive View(Case Study: Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran)', Political and International Approaches, 13(4), pp. 93-123. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.210002.0
VANCOUVER
Tajik, M., Rezazadeh, K. Focauldian Productive Power from a Discursive View(Case Study: Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Political and International Approaches, 2022; 13(4): 93-123. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.210002.0
)