The present research tries to analyze the policy of the ninth and tenth government in the field of political rights of citizenship, with an emphasis on political modernity, by analytical-descriptive method and with emphasis on citizenship political rights. Accordingly, the main question of this research is that the policy making of the political rights of citizens of the ninth and tenth governments in the field of political modernity can be explained? Our assumption, in response to this question, is that the policies of the ninth and tenth governments are aimed at weakening the political rights of citizenship and the expansion of mass society. The results of the survey showed that in the ninth and tenths of the government, the weakening and limitation of the political rights of citizenship led to the collapse and disintegration of the distinctions and divisions of contemporary political modernity, which resulted from the expansion of government interference, the weakening of civil society and the emergence of a kind of authoritarianism, lack of accountability and transparency of the state and finally, the deepening of the features of the mass society has become more and more.
لیپسیت. مارتین. (1383). دایره المعارف دموکراسی، ترجمه کامران خانی و نورالله مرادی، تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.
متقی زاده، محسن. (1380). سازمان‌های غیردولتی نهادی برای سازمان‌دهی مشارکت در جامعه مدنی، تهران: وزارت کشور.
معدل، منصور؛ کمالی، سید مجید. (1385). اسلام و مدرنیته سیاسی؛ مقدمه‌ای بر آسیب‌شناسی تاریخی
فرهنگ و سیاست جوامع اسلامی، خردنامه همشهری، اردیبهشت، شماره 2، 48 تا 50.
ب) منابع انگلیسی
Arendt, Hana. (1951). Totalitarianism and the Social Sciences, New Yurok: Meridian Books.
Tusalem, Rollin F. (2007). A Boon or a Bane? The Role of Civil Society in Third- and Fourth- Wave Democracies, International Political Science Review, Vol. 28, No3, PP. 361-386.
Erlbaum. (2016). what are political rights?, 17 July, available on: Source: NewsDay Zimbabwe. ZimSitRep.
Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza. (2009). Macroeconomic of populism in Iran. Available on: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15546/
Janos Ki. T. (1998). citizenship and civil society: A frame work of Rights and obligations in liberal Traditional and social Democratic Regime.
Kornhauser. William. (1959). the politics of mass society, International library of sociology and social reconstruction, Publisher: University of Michigan...
Marshall. T. H. (1994). Citizenship and social class, Cambridge: Pluto press.
Shils. E. (1962). The Theory of Mass Society, New York: Free Press.
ج) منابع الکترونیکی
آزادی احزاب در دولت روحانی و احمدی‌نژاد، 30 آبان 1392: https://www.khabaronline.ir
انتخابات برگزارشده در ایران،12 آبان 1396: www.moi.irl
تفاوت دولتی که احمدی‌نژاد از خاتمی تحویل گرفت با آنچه به روحانی تحویل داد، 15 تیر 92: www.entekhab.ir
تفاوت رویکرد دولت احمدی‌نژاد و روحانی درباره احزاب،22 مرداد 1395: www.khabaronline.ir
سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد در دولت نهم و دهم، 1 تیر 1387www.donya-e-eqtesad.com
گزارش فارس از انتخابات ریاست جمهوری و شهر و روستا، 9 اردیبهشت 1392: www.farsnews.com/newstext
Ghafari, M., & Tarjoman, F. (2019). The Political in the Hisoriography of Motahhar Ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi. Political and International Approaches, 9(3), 150-175.
MLA
Masoud Ghafari; Fariba Tarjoman. "The Political in the Hisoriography of Motahhar Ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi", Political and International Approaches, 9, 3, 2019, 150-175.
HARVARD
Ghafari, M., Tarjoman, F. (2019). 'The Political in the Hisoriography of Motahhar Ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi', Political and International Approaches, 9(3), pp. 150-175.
VANCOUVER
Ghafari, M., Tarjoman, F. The Political in the Hisoriography of Motahhar Ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi. Political and International Approaches, 2019; 9(3): 150-175.
)