Political and International Approaches

Political and International Approaches

Kazakhstan's New Public-Cultural Diplomacy: Analysis of Key Factors and Drivers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
seyed mohmamd hosein akramian 1
ali akbar talebi matin 2
1 PhD in Political Science, Department of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran. Iran.
2 PhD in Cultural Management, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
10.48308/piaj.2026.244394.1891
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives:

In recent decades, public and cultural diplomacy has been one of the important foreign policy tools of governments to strengthen soft power, manage international image, and expand normative influence in the international arena. In the meantime, the governance of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as one of the important actors in Central Asia, has tried to enhance the country's regional and transregional position within the framework of modern public diplomacy by utilizing its identity, cultural, media, and institutional capacities. This article aims to explain the trends, practices, and main drivers of Kazakhstan's public and cultural diplomacy in recent years, as well as to identify factors affecting the future of this field. The theoretical framework of the research is based on the model of modern public diplomacy presented by "Kall" and "Mellisen". The main question of the research is: “What are the trends and practices of Kazakhstan’s public and cultural diplomacy within the framework of the modern public diplomacy approach and what are the most important factors influencing and being influenced by the process of this diplomacy?” This research is based on the hypothesis that; “Kazakhstan’s modern public and cultural diplomacy has been pursued in recent years in a multi-level process that can be adapted in the framework of the Kall and Melisson model, and by understanding the path and factors affecting this modern public and cultural diplomacy, it is possible to explain the interactive capacities and take advantage of this opportunity.”

Method:

The present research was conducted with a mixed approach and uses documentary analysis methods, a review of scientific and policy sources, and expert meeting data. In the future research section, the structural analysis method and MICMAC software were used to identify and analyze the key drivers affecting Kazakhstan’s public and cultural diplomacy. Thus, while extracting effective variables from theoretical literature and documentary-library data, the interrelationships between these variables have been analyzed and their effectiveness and efficiency have been evaluated within the framework of systematic analysis.

Findings:

The research findings show that Kazakhstan's modern public diplomacy is based on a set of identity, cultural, media, and strategic drivers. The most important of these drivers include linguistic and ethnic pluralism, re-creation of national identity, diplomacy of traditional religions, development of media and digital diplomacy, expansion of scientific and educational diplomacy, and adoption of a multilateral and balanced foreign policy. In addition, efforts to develop cultural tourism, strengthen regional interactions in Central Asia, utilize the cultural capacities of the Turkic world, and pay attention to Kazakhstan's cultural position as a crossroads of Eurasian civilization are other important factors in strengthening this country's public diplomacy. The results of the structural analysis show that some of these variables, especially multifaceted foreign policy, multilayered cultural identity, and cultural institutional capacities, are among the strategic and bifaceted factors that play a decisive role in shaping the future of Kazakhstan's public diplomacy.

Conclusion:

According to the research findings, in recent years, Kazakhstan has been seeking to design and implement a coherent model of public and cultural diplomacy that is consistent with the modern public diplomacy approach. Within this framework, multifaceted foreign policy, simultaneous interaction with global and regional powers, and utilization of cultural and identity capacities constitute the main axes of the country's public diplomacy strategy
Keywords
Public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, soft power, Kazakhstan,, Iran'
s interactive capacities
 
 
 
References
‒    Anholt, S. (2008), Current Practice and Future Horizons for Nation Branding. In K. Dinnie (Ed.), Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann.
‒    Astana Times. (2016, June 21), Kazakh Foreign Ministry Presents “Kazakhstan – Land of the Great Steppe” App. https://astanatimes.com/2016/06/kazakh-foreign-ministry-presents-kazakhstan-land-of-
‒    Astana Times. (2017, May), Abai Opera to Be Performed During EXPO 2017. https://astanatimes.com/2017/05/abai-opera-to-be-performed-during-expo-2017/
‒    Basiri, M. A., & Ahmadinejad, H. (2017), Explaining the cultural diplomacy of Seyyed Mohammad Khatami and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the international system. Political and International Approaches Quarterly, 7(46), (In Persian)
‒    Beacháin, D. Ó. (2011), Social and Political Perceptions of the Borat Phenomenon in Kazakhstan: Evidence From a Case Study of University Students. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 3(3).
‒    Central Intelligence Agency. (2024), Kazakhstan: People and Society. The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
‒    Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions. (2022), Official Final Declaration of the 7th Congress. Astana.
‒    Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions. (2025), Official Program of the 8th Congress. Astana.
‒    Cornell, S. E., & Starr, S. F. (2020), Kazakhstan’s Role in International Mediation Under First President Nursultan Nazarbayev. Institute for Security and Development Policy. https://isdp.eu/publication/kazakhstans-role-in-international-mediation/
‒    Cull, N. J. (2008), Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31–54.
‒    Cull, N. J. (2009), Public Diplomacy: Lessons From the Past. Figueroa Press.
‒    Cull, N. J. (2017), Soft Power’s Next Steppe: National Projection at the Astana EXPO 2017. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy.
‒    Cull, N. J. (2019), Public Diplomacy: Foundations for Global Engagement in the Digital Age. Polity Press.
‒    Daraj, H. (2023), Analyzing the dimensions of Kazakhstan’s multifaceted and balanced foreign policy. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 37(3), 117–146. (In Persian)
‒    Darj, H. (2023), Exploring the Dimensions of Kazakhstan’s Multi-Vector Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 37(3), 117–146.
‒    Dehghani Firoozabadi, S. J., & Shokri, M. (2020), Analyzing the strategy of resistance in the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear diplomacy based on the cultural theory of international relations. Political and International Approaches Quarterly, 12(1), Article 63. (In Persian)
‒    Denzin, N. K. (2012), Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
‒    ENIC-Kazakhstan. (2024), Higher Education Institutions in Kazakhstan. https://enic-kazakhstan.edu.kz/en/reference_information/universities
‒    Godet, M. (2006), Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. Economica.
‒    Golestan, P., & Toluie, A. (2026), The Russian language in Central Asia and the Caucasus: A language of power and regional institutions. Central Asia and Caucasus Studies Quarterly, 32(133), 79–104. (In Persian)
‒    Grincheva, N. (2013), Cultural Diplomacy 2.0: Challenges and Opportunities in Museum International Practices. Museum and Society, 11(1).
‒    Ilkhamov, A. (2005), Post-Soviet Central Asia: From Nationhood Mythologies to Regional Cold Wars. In I. Morozova (Ed.), Towards Social Stability and Democratic Governance in Central Eurasia. IOS Press.
‒    Kalirad, A., & Amini Aria, F. (2022), The Alash Movement and the Formation of Kazakhstan: Transition From Tribal Society to Nation-State (1917–1920). Journal of Islamic History Studies, 54, 145–166.
‒    Keyvan-Hosseini, S. A., & Bahrami, Z. (2020), U.S. scientific diplomacy in Kazakhstan. Central Asia and the Caucasus Quarterly,(112). (In Persian)
‒    Koułaei, E., & Ebrahimi, A. (2013), Geopolitical Analysis of Relations Between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Geopolitics, 30, 49–81.
‒    Kudaibergenova, D. T. (2011), National Identity Formation in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Soviet Legacy, Primordialism, and Patterns of Ideological Development Since 1991. In Ş. Akyildiz & R. Carlson (Eds.), Social and Cultural Change in Central Asia. Routledge.
‒    Kuşçu, I. (2016), Changing Perception of Homeland for the Kazakh Diaspora. Nationalities Papers, 44.
‒    Laruelle, M. (2020), Russia and Central Asia. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies.
‒    Marat, E. (2009), Nation Branding in Central Asia: A New Campaign to Present Ideas About the State and the Nation. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(7).
‒    Melissen, J. (2011), Beyond the New Public Diplomacy. Clingendael Papers in Diplomacy, 3, 1–28.
‒    Melissen, J. (Ed.), (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
‒    Melissen, J., & Sohn, Y. (2015), Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
‒    Mirambekov, M., & Abdokhodai, M. (2022), Kazakhstan and the Silk Road Economic Belt: Opportunities and Challenges. Geopolitics, 68, 199–227.
‒    Nazarbayev, N. (1997), Strategy “Kazakhstan–2030.” Official Website of the President of Kazakhstan. https://www.akorda.kz
‒    Nazarbayev, N. (2017), Address to the People of Kazakhstan. Official Website of the President of Kazakhstan. https://www.akorda.kz
‒    Norén, P. (2023, May 16), Kazakhstan Reimagines Its Roots as a Cultural Revival Takes Hold. Caspian Post. https://caspianpost.com/
‒    Özdener. (2019), The Golden Man Exhibition in Turkey. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/kultur-sanat/2500-yillik-altin-elbiseli-adam-turkiyede-/1583436
‒    Paksoy, H. (2022), Ozkaz: Kazakh Cultural and Historical Narratives. http://www.angelfire.com/on/paksoy/ozkaz.html
‒    Portal CIS. (2024), Experience of Implementing the “Cultural Capitals of the Commonwealth” Program. https://e-cis.info
‒    Pourahmadi, H., Ghiasi, S., & Ghaemi, Y. (2019), Analyzing Saudi Arabia’s influence in the region and the Islamic world and the strategy for countering Iran. Scientific Quarterly of Political and International Approaches, 12(3), Article 65. (In Persian)
‒    Rabiei, H., Abbasi, R., Amir Ahmadian, B., & Abdi, A. (2018), Geo-Economic Analysis of Iran–Kazakhstan Relations. Geographical Research, 129, 14–30.
‒    Ranjkesh, M. J. (2018), A comparative analysis of Iran’s and Turkey’s cultural diplomacy in Central Asia. Biannual Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2, 69–84. (In Persian)
‒    Razapour, D., & Simbar, R. (2019), China’s New Silk Road Initiative: Opportunities and Threats for Iran, Pakistan and Kazakhstan. International Political Economy Studies, 1(1), 157–186.
‒    Sagintayeva, A., & Kurakbayev, K. (2015), Understanding the Transition of Public Universities to Institutional Autonomy in Kazakhstan. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(2).
‒    Seyyed Taghizadeh, S. H., & Goudarzi, M. (2023), The position of economic programs in the public diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran toward the new Iraq. Scientific Quarterly of Political and International Approaches, 15(1), Article 75. (In Persian)
‒    Spehr, A., & Kassenova, N. (2020), Kazakhstan: Unfulfilled Promise. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
‒    TS.in.kz. (2022), Kazakhstan Cultural Discussion Forum. http://ts.in.kz
‒    Tuleuova, K., Sheryazdanova, K., & Alpeisov, A. (2019), Rukhani Zhangyru as the Cornerstone in the Foreign Cultural Policy of Kazakhstan. Opción, 35(90).
‒    UNESCO Kazakhstan. (2020), History of Cultural Heritage in Kazakhstan. http://www.unesco.kz/heritagenet/kz/hn-english/history_en.htm
‒    UNESCO. (2023), Publications of the Kazakh Research Institute of Culture. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad
‒    UNESCO. (2024), Cultural Heritage of Kazakhstan. http://www.unesco.kz
‒    Urpekova, A. (2022), Building the Bonds: A Comparison of Diaspora Engagement Policies in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies, 2(1).