Political and International Approaches

Political and International Approaches

The Iranian Constitutional Revolution and the Symbolic Field of Contestant: Social Forces and the Construction of Threefold Narratives

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sara Nazif 1
Ehsan Mozdkhah 2
Mehdi Najafzadeh 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science (Iranian Studies), Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 PhD. Candidate in Political Science (Iranian Studies), Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
10.48308/piaj.2026.241636.1769
Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction: The Constitutional Revolution in Iran (1905–1911) can be conceptualized not merely as a localized political disruption, but as an epistemological arena defined by the confrontation of three distinct symbolic horizons that ultimately determined the trajectory of the movement. Foundational concepts—such as law, nation, freedom, sovereignty, and representation—each carrying specific institutional definitions within Western modernity, became highly contested sites of semantic struggle in Qajar-era Iran. The three primary social forces driving the revolution—namely the clergy, theoretical intellectuals, and instrumental intellectuals—each interpreted and operationalized these concepts from fundamentally divergent ideological perspectives. The absence of a convergent semantic field meant that this interpretative plurality, rather than generating strategic synergy, culminated in a structural conflict that reached its apex with the bombardment of the parliament in 1908. The failure to consolidate constitutional institutions was therefore not solely a product of structural vulnerabilities or foreign imperial interventions; it was deeply rooted in a profound deficit of semantic consensus among these core social forces. Although all three factions utilized a shared vocabulary, they reproduced these concepts in mutually contradictory ways within the matrix of symbolic interaction. This study addresses a central research question: Why did the Iranian Constitutional Revolution fail to produce a sustainable symbolic consensus among its constituent social forces?
Methods: Utilizing Herbert Blumer’s theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism, this study reinterprets the Constitutional Revolution as a contested field of meaning-construction surrounding key political symbols. It employs qualitative textual analysis to examine Qajar-era political treatises, contemporary periodicals, and the personal correspondences of both secular intellectuals and clerics. The objective is to trace how these actors endowed constitutional concepts with specific meanings and negotiated them within the emerging public sphere. To operationalize this framework, the study systematically maps the three major intellectual currents within a comparative analytical matrix (categorizing variables such as conceptions of law, orientation toward tradition and the West, the ultimate teleology of constitutionalism, and the ideal political subject), followed by a close reading of symbolic disputes, particularly the competing interpretations surrounding the institutionalization of the Divan-Khaneh-ye Adliat (House of Justice).
Results and discussion: The analysis identifies three distinct meaning-making projects within the constitutional discourse. First, theoretical intellectuals prioritized a form of constitutional legalism grounded in Enlightenment rationality and natural rights, conceiving the autonomous citizen as the primary locus of collective reason. Second, instrumental intellectuals emphasized administrative order, state capacity, and technocratic optimization, aiming to construct a disciplined bureaucracy alongside a centralized nation-state. Third, the clergy advanced the paradigm of "legitimate constitutionalism" (Mashruteh-ye Mashru‘eh), wherein concepts of law, justice, and sovereignty were subordinated to Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh), with the preservation of the Islamic moral order as the ultimate objective and the pious believer as the normative political subject. This tripartite ideological configuration explains why shared symbols failed to achieve structural stability. The discourse of Mashru‘eh directly challenged the liberal-secular tenets of constitutionalism, while the state-building imperative of instrumental intellectuals steered the movement toward centralization and authoritarian technocracy. The outcome was not a cohesive synthesis, but a persistent semantic misalignment that fractured political alliances and hindered institutional consolidation. In the absence of a unified political language, the dialectical integration of tradition and modernity fractured, leaving a heterogeneous legacy composed of modern institutional facades, traditional socio-political elements, and state authoritarianism.
Conclusion: The historical trajectory of Iran's Constitutional Revolution demonstrates that political projects endure only when institutional frameworks and shared meanings evolve in tandem. Lacking a coherent political vocabulary capable of mediating the tensions among tradition, Western modernity, and statehood, the constitutional movement became deeply fragmented. The resulting state apparatus emerged as legally modern in appearance, normatively contested in legitimacy, and administratively state-centric in execution—a path dependency that shaped twentieth-century Iranian politics.
Keywords: Constitutionalism - Symbolic Interactionism - Social Forces of the Constitutional Revolution - Deficit of Semantic Consensus
Keywords
Constitutional Revolution
Symbolic Interactionism
Social Forces of the Constitutional Revolution
Lack of Shared Understanding
-     Abadian, Hossein (2004), The Crisis of Constitutionalism in Iran. Tehran: Institute for Political and International Studies. ]In Persian[
-     Abrahamian, Ervand (2010), Iran Between Two Revolutions (trans. Ahmad Golmohammadi & Mohammad Ebrahim Fattahi), Tehran: Ney. ]In Persian[
-     Adamiyat, Fereydoun (1967), The Ideas of Talebof Tabrizi. (n.p.). ]In Persian[
-     Adamiyat, Fereydoun (2006), The Thought of Progress and the Rule of Law in the Sepahsalar Era. Tehran: Kharazmi ]In Persian[
-     Adamiyat, Fereydoun (2009), The Ideology of the Iranian Constitutional Movement, Vol. 1. Tehran: Payam Publications. ]In Persian[
-     Afshar, Iraj (1998), Iranian Studies: In Memory of Saeed Nafisi, a Pioneer of Iranian Studies Research. Bukhara Journal, No. 4. ]In Persian[
-     Ahmadian Shijani, Mehdi (2020), The Historical Tragedy of Constitutionalism: Intellectuals, Clergy, and Women. Tehran: Gah. ]In Persian[
-     Ajoudani, Mashallah (2003), Iranian Constitutionalism. Tehran: Akhtaran. ]In Persian[
-     Akhtar Newspaper, No. 13, Istanbul, January 1876. ]In Persian[
-     Akhundzadeh, Mirza Fath Ali (1985), The Letters of Kamal al-Dowleh to Jamal al-Dowleh. Outside Iran: Mard-e Emrooz. ]In Persian[
-     Asil, Hojjatollah (2008), Treatises of Mirza Malkom Khan Nazem al-Dowleh. Tehran: Ney. ]In Persian[
-     Blumer, Herbert (2023), Symbolic Interactionism (trans. Hossein Abolhasan Tanhayi). Tehran: Ehsan Publications. ]In Persian[
-     Ettehadiyeh, Mansoureh (1996), Parliament and Elections: From the Constitutional Revolution to the End of the Qajar Era. Tehran: Nashr-e Tarikh-e Iran. ]In Persian[
-     Gheissari, Ali; Nasr, Vali (2022), Democracy in Iran: The Quest for Liberty (trans. Mirhassan Raiszadeh), Tehran: Farhang-e Javid. ]In Persian[
-     Haeri, Abdolhadi (2002), Shi ‘ism and Constitutionalism in Iran and the Role of Iranians Residing in Iraq. Tehran: Amir Kabir. ]In Persian[
-     Heydari-Behnouiyeh, Abbas (2020), Language and Paradoxes in Constitutional Discourse. Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. ]In Persian[
-     Jafari Arjeyeh, Fatemeh (2010), The Roots of the Bombardment of the Parliament and the Beginning of the Minor Despotism: The Difficult Path of Constitutionalism. No. 218, pp. 44–48. ]In Persian[
-     Jafarian, Rasoul (2006), An Urban Understanding of Constitutionalism: A Comparison of Constitutional Movements in Isfahan and Tabriz. Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Historical Studies. ]In Persian[
-     Kadivar, Mohsen (2006), Khorasani’s Political Treatise: Political Writings of Akhund Molla Mohammad Kazem Khorasani. Tehran: Kavir. ]In Persian[
-     Kamali, Masoud (2002), Civil Society, State, and Modernization in Contemporary Iran (trans. Kamal Pooladi). Tehran: Center for the Recognition of Islam and Iran. ]In Persian[
-     Malkom Khan Nazem al-Dowleh (2002), Faramooshkhaneh and Jame ‘-ye Adamiyat. In: Treatises of Mirza Malkom Khan, ed. Hojjatollah Asil, p. 327. ]In Persian[
-     Masoudi, Ali (2021), Iranian Constitutionalism and the Question of Law. Tehran: Elmi–Farhangi. ]In Persian[
-     Mirzavand, Moslem; Hassanpoosh, Sajjad (2017), The Confrontation of Two Modes of Thought: The Impact of Mohammad Ali Shah’s Russian Upbringing on His Approach to Constitutionalists. Monthly Journal of Historical, Social and Political Research, Issue 2, pp. 19–28. ]In Persian[
-     Mohammadpour, Ahmad (2017), Contemporary Research Methods in the Humanities: Discussions on Methodological Policies. Tehran: Qoqnoos. ]In Persian[
-     Mohammadzadeh, Ali (2015), A Sociological Analysis of the Political Thought and Action of Seyyed Hassan Taqizadeh (with Emphasis on the Constitutional Period). Historical Sociology Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 121–157. ]In Persian[
-     Mostashar al-Dowleh, Mirza Yousof Khan. (2013), One Word and One Letter, ed. Mohammad Sadegh Feyz. Tehran: Sabah Publishing. ]In Persian[
-     Mousavi, Seyyed Bahram (2019), The Political and Cultural Career of Mohammad Ali Foroughi. Tehran: Erfan Publications. ]In Persian[
-     Naeini, Mohammad Hossein (1999), Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih al-Millah, with introduction and edition by Seyyed Mahmoud Taleghani. Tehran: Entehshar. ]In Persian[
-     Najafi Esfahani, Aqa Noorollah (2009), The Treatise of Conversations between Resident and Traveler. Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Historical Studies. ]In Persian[
-     Najafzadeh, Mehdi (2010), Clerical Presuppositions and Perceptions of Constitutionalism. Political-Economic Information Journal, Nos. 275–276, pp. 66–79. ]In Persian[
-     Nouri, Fazlollah (1998), Tazkirat al-Ghafel wa Irshad al-Jahel. In: Treatises on Constitutionalism, ed. Gholamhossein Zargarinejad. Tehran: Kavir. ]In Persian[
-     Pahlavan, Changiz. (2003), The Roots of Modernity. Tehran: Qatreh Publishing. ]In Persian[
-     Qanun Newspaper, No. 1, London, Rajab 1307 AH. ]In Persian[
-     Qanun Newspaper, No. 4, London, Shawwal 1307 AH. ]In Persian[
-     Qanun Newspaper, No. 4. ]In Persian[
-     Qezelsafi, Mohammad Taqi; Nourian Dehkordi, Negin. (2018), Statism and Anti-Statism in the Constitutional Era: A Reappraisal of Three Perspectives. Political Science Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 73–102. ]In Persian[
-     Ritzer, George (2009), Contemporary Sociological Theory (trans. Mohsen Salasi). Tehran: Elmi. ]In Persian[
-     Tabatabaei, Javad (1993), Once Again on Modernity and Development. Farhang-e Tose ‘eh, Year 2, No. 7, pp. 50–51. ]In Persian[
-     Tabatabaei, Javad (2007), The Theory of the Philosophy of Law in Iran, Vol. 2. Tehran: Sotoudeh. ]In Persian[
-     Tabatabaei, Seyyed Javad (2003), The History of Modern Political Thought in Europe from the Renaissance to the French Revolution: The Conflict of Old and New. Tehran: Minouye Kherad. ]In Persian[
-     Tanhayi, Hossein Abolhasan (1998), An Introduction to Schools and Theories of Sociology, Part II. Mashhad: Marandiz. ]In Persian[
-     Tanhayi, Hossein Abolhasan (2007), Sociological Theories. Mashhad: Marandiz. ]In Persian[
-     Tanhayi, Hossein Abolhasan (2007), Structural Analysis of Ongoing Action in Herbert Blumer’s Theory of Symbolic Interactionism. Journal of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, No. 8, pp. 9–23. ]In Persian[
-     Tanhayi, Hossein Abolhasan (2009), Sociological Theories. Qom: SAMT. ]In Persian[
-     Torkaman, Farah & Amir Nikpey (2010), A Sociological Explanation of Ideology and Political Development in Iran. Tehran: Elm. ]In Persian[