Department of Political Science and International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.29252/piaj.2023.229624.1316
Abstract
The emergence of China's economic power, along with the decrease of America's share in global production and international trade, has led to a change in the geopolitical landscape of the world and in the economic balance in the international arena, which has finally brought the trade competition between China and America to its peak and it has emerged in the form of trade war. This matter caused Southeast Asian countries to become a field of economic conflict between China and America. The main question of this research is how the trade war between China and America has affected the economy of Southeast Asian countries? In response to this hypothesis, it is investigated with an explanatory method that the trade war between China and America through trade tariffs and import restrictions leads to a change in imports-exports and trade deals with Southeast Asian countries, especially Vietnam and Taiwan. The purpose of this research is to explain China and America’s economic policy based on the strategy of neo-mercantilism in the form of the trade war and how this war has changed the economic balance in the whole world, especially in Southeast Asian countries.
Aliison, G., Kiersznowski. N. & Fitzek (2022), “The Great Economic Rivalry: China vs the U.S.”, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 1-47.
Bekkers, E & Schroeter, S. (2020), “An Economic Analysis of the US-China Trade Conflict”, Economic Research and Statistics Division World Trade Organization.
Belesky, P. & Lawrence, G. (2018), “Chinese state capitalism and neomercantilism in the contemporary food regime: contradictions, continuity and change”, The Journal of Peasant Studies. 1-23.
Chen, J., Lin, H. & Lien, Y. (n.d),” Taiwan’s Shifting Role in the Global Supply Chain in the U.S China Trade War”, Joint U.S- Korea Academic Studies, 316-329.
Everington, K. (7 November, 2019), UN recognizes Taiwan as biggest winner from US-China trade war, Date of extraction: 19/10/2022, Available at: Taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3812152.
Veebel, V. (2015), “Baltic Pathways from Liberal Trade Model to Neo-Mercantilism in the European Union”, Managing Global Transitions, 13(3): 213-229.
Walters, R. (2023), “US-Taiwan Economic Relations in 2023: Causes for Measured Optimism”, Global Taiwan Brief, 1-14.
Wang, O. (10 June, 2022), How much is China’s foreign direct investment and is it still a good destination for overseas investors?, Date of extraction: 2/10/2022, Available at: https://www.scmp.com.
Woetzel, J., Seong, J, Leung, N., et al. (2019), “China and the world: Inside the dynamics of a changing relationship”, McKinsey Global Institute, 1-157.
Ziegler, Ch. E., & Menon, R. (2014), “Neomercantilism and Great-Power Energy Competition in Central Asia and the Caspian”, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 17-41.
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A., & Haddad Zand, S. (2023). The trade war between China and the United States and its consequences on Southeast Asian countries; a case study of Vietnam and Taiwan. Political and International Approaches, 14(3), 201-228. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2023.229624.1316
MLA
Arsalan Ghorbani Sheikhneshin; Shirin Haddad Zand. "The trade war between China and the United States and its consequences on Southeast Asian countries; a case study of Vietnam and Taiwan". Political and International Approaches, 14, 3, 2023, 201-228. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2023.229624.1316
HARVARD
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A., Haddad Zand, S. (2023). 'The trade war between China and the United States and its consequences on Southeast Asian countries; a case study of Vietnam and Taiwan', Political and International Approaches, 14(3), pp. 201-228. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2023.229624.1316
VANCOUVER
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A., Haddad Zand, S. The trade war between China and the United States and its consequences on Southeast Asian countries; a case study of Vietnam and Taiwan. Political and International Approaches, 2023; 14(3): 201-228. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2023.229624.1316
)