Narratives of Iranian cinema in the evolution of discipline and power in school

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Political Thought, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran

2 Faculty member of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran

10.29252/piaj.2022.224975.1168

Abstract

The main topic in the social construction of childhood is the category of control and discipline. The school - along with other child control institutions - shapes the child's order, understanding and learning, maturity and development, skills and control, and the regulation of the child's imagination and mind through its designs and settings. The present article intends to reflect narratives of Iranian cinema in which Iranian children have been exposed to specific methods of control as a basic micropolitical tool of power and how these methods have evolved. The hypothesis of the article is that according to the cinematic narratives of the changes of discipline and power in school, the micropolitics of power in this institution has gone through three stages of resistance against discipline, legitimization of discipline and finally Dominance of discipline. In this study, using the genealogical method of Foucault and descriptive-analytical method, the reflection of Iranian children in school in three selected films from the decades after the Islamic Revolution, has been examined from the micropolitical perspective of power.

Keywords

References

  •  

     

    منابع

    • ایروانی، شهین (1393)، «مقدمه­ای بر تبیین ماهیت نظام آموزش و پرورش ایران از آغاز دوره مدرن­سازی تا امروز» پژوهش­نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 4
    • حاضری، علی محمد، امین آریان­راد (1396)، «مسئله عدالت آموزشی در دهة نخست دورة جمهوری اسلامی»، فصلنامه تاریخنامه انقلاب، شماره 1
    • دانایی، مجید، حسین بهروان، سیمین فروغ­زاده(1391)، «جامعه­شناسی پدیدارشناسانه درک معنای دوستی»، فصلنامه جامعه­شناسی آموزش و پرورش، شماره 3
    • زارع، بیژن ، عیسی عابدینی، لطف اله پورهشترودی(1396)، «آموزش و یادگیری شهروندی، حلقه مفقوده نظام آموزشی کشور»،همایش ملی آسیب شناسی نظام آموزشی کشور،تبریزhttps://civilica.com/doc/839350
    • ساعی، علی، معصومه قاراخانی، فرشاد مومنی (1390)، «دولت و سیاست آموزش در ایران از سال 1360 تا 1388» ش، فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، شماره 56
    • سعیدی، علی­اصغر، فاطمه قرآن­کیش (1391)، «مطالعة مقولات سیاست اجتماعی در کتب فارسی مقطع ابتدایی نظام آموزشی ایران»، فصلنامه جامعه­شناسی آموزش و پرورش، شماره 3
    • فوکو، میشل و دیگران(1376)، خرد در سیاست، ترجمه عزت­الله فولادوند، طرح نو
    • کاشی، غلامرضا (1390)، «تحلیل فضا به مثابه گفتمان­کاوی میدانی»، مجله مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، دوره 5 ، شماره 2
    • کاشی ، غلامرضا( 1386)، فضای دانشگاه: سیاست­ورزی و ناسازه­های هویتی در زندگی دانشجویان، پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فن­آوری
    • مهرعلی­زاده، یدالله (1377)، «خصوصی­سازی مدارس در ایران»، مجله علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دوره سوم، شماره­های 3 و 4
    • هیندس، باری (1380)، گفتارهای قدرت از هابز تا فوکو، ترجمه مصطفی یونسی، نشر شیرازه
    • Ball, S. J. (1987), The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York: Methuen.
    • Best, Steven and Kelner, Douglas (1991), Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: The Guilford Press.
    • Björk, L., & Lindle, J. (2001), Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1),
    • 76–91.
    • Blase, J. (Ed.). (1991), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Blase, J., & Björk, L. (2010), The Micropolitics of Educational Change and Reform: Cracking Open the Black Box. Second International Handbook of Educational Change, 237–258. https://doi.org/1007/978-90-481-2660-6_14
    • Bridges, E. M., & Groves, B. R. (1999), The macropolitics and micropolitics of personnel evaluation: A framework. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 321–337.
    • Bloome, D., Carter, S., Christian, B., Otto, S., & Huart-Faris, N. (2005), Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahway,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Boyd,W. L. (1991), Foreword. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. vii–ix). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Cooper, B., Ehrensal, P., & Bromme, M. (2005), School level politics and professional development: Traps in evaluating the quality of practicing teachers. Educational Policy, 19(1), 112–125.
    • Hoyle, E. (1982), Micropolitics of Educational Organisations. Educational Management & Administration, 10(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114328201000202
    • Johnson, B. L. (2001), Micropolitical dynamics of education interests: A view from within. Educational Policy, 15(1), 115–134.
    • Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002a), The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrativebiographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105–120.
    • Lee, C. (2006), “Every good-by ain’t gone”: Analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(3), 305–327.
    • Malen, B. (2006), The micropolitics of education: mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school polities. Journal of Education Policy, 9(5), 147–167. https://doi.org/1080/0268093940090513
    • Morgan, G. (1986), Images of organization. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    • Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (1999), The politics of teacher evaluation: A case study of new system design and implementation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 339–359.
    • Winograd, K. (2002), The negotiative dimension of teaching: Teachers sharing power with the less powerful. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 343–362.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics