مسئلۀ محیط زیست، اولویتی در ساحت نظریه پردازی سیاسی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

عضو هیأت علمی پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی

10.29252/piaj.2021.220116.1009

چکیده

به تدریج بر شمار آن دسته از اندیشمندان سیاسی افزوده می‌شود که خود را با وجهی از مسئله محیط‌زیست رو به رو می‌بینند و در می‌یابند که پرداختن به این مسئله در نظریه سیاسی معاصر ضروری است. اکنون مسئله مندی محیط‌زیست، به دو صورت به هم پیوسته در ساحت نظریه‌پردازی سیاسی نمایان شده است؛ نخست در به فهم درآمدن عوامل سیاسی ایجاد مسائل خرد و کلان زیست‌محیطی و دیگری در شناخت چگونگی مواجهه سیاسی با آن مسائل. نظریه سیاسی به منزله عامل شکل دهنده روندها، نهادها و کنش‌های سیاسی در پیوند با مفاهیم و ارزش‌های سیاسی، با این پرسش رو به روست که با چه تمهیداتی می‌شود توجه به اولویت مسئله مندی محیط‌زیست را در مناسبات قدرت سیاسی نهادینه کرد. به بیان دیگر، برای نظریه‌پرداز سیاسی این پرسش مطرح می‌شود که چگونه باید بر اساس فلسفه سیاسی خاص، مناسبات قدرت را به گونه‌ای "جهت داد" که همواره دغدغه‌های زیست‌محیطی، در جایگاه اولویتی تثبیت شده، در این مناسبات به دیده گرفته شوند. این مقاله دستاورد تأمل و پژوهش به روش تحلیلی- انتقادی درباره وجوهی از کلان مسئله محیط‌زیست است که حل آنها به نظریه‌پردازی سیاسی مناسب نیاز دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Environmental Problem As a Priority for Political Theorizing

نویسنده [English]

  • Pegah Mossleh
Faculty Member of the Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
چکیده [English]

The number of political thinkers who find themselves facing the environmental problems and realize that it is necessary to pay attention to this issue in contemporary political theory is gradually increasing. The problematic nature of the issue is now appeared in two interrelated features in political theorizing. First, in understanding the political factors that create micro and macro environmental problems, and second, in understanding how to deal with them politically. Political theory, as constructive framework of political processes, institutions and actions based on political concepts and value, raises the question of what measures can be taken to prioritize environmental problematics in power relations. In other words, for the political theorist this question arises that how power relations should be "directed", according to a particular political philosophy, in such a way that environmental concerns would be always considered as a fixed priority in these relations. This article is the result of reflection and research with an analytical-critical method on aspects of the environmental problem which require appropriate political theorizing to solve.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Political Theory
  • Political Theorizing
  • Political Processes
  • Environmental Problem
  • Political Ecology

مراجع

  • منابع

    • Agardy, Franklin J. & Nelson Leonard Nemerow (eds.) (2005), Environmental Solutions: Environmental Problems and the All-inclusive Global, Scientific, Political, Legal, Economic, Medical, and Engineering Bases to Solve Them, San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Bäckstrand, Karin, Jamil Khan, Annica Kronsell, and Ewa Lövbrand (eds.) (2010), Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance, Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
    • Bennett, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press.
    • Board, Susan (2002), Ecological Relations: Towards an Inclusive Politics of the Earth, London: Routledge.
    • Boggs, Carl (2012), Ecology and Revolution: Global Crisis and the Political Challenge, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Bookchin, Murray (1982), The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy, Palo Alto: Cheshire Books.
    • Brulle, Robert J. (2000), Agency, Democracy, and Nature: The U.S Environmental Movements from a Critical Theory Perspective, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Bryant, Raymond and Sinead Bailey (1997), Third World Political Ecology, London: Routledge.
    • Carter, Alan (1999), A Radical Green Political Theory, New York: Routledge.
    • Di Gregorio, Monica, et al., (2017), "How Institutions and Beliefs Affect Environmental Discourse: Evidence from an Eight-Country Survey on REDD+", in Global Environmental Change, 45 (2017), pp. 133-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.006.
    • Dobson, Andrew and Paul Lucardie (eds.) (1993), The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory, London: Routledge.
    • Dobson, Andrew (ed.) (1999), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, Oxford University Press.
    • Dobson, Andrew and Robyn Eckersley (eds.) (2006), Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge, Cambridge University Press.
    • Doherty, Brian (2002), Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement, London: Routledge.
    • Doyle, Timothy (2005), Environmental Movements in Majority and Minority Worlds: A Global Perspective, Rutgers University Press.
    • Dryzek, John (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics,
    • Contestations, Oxford University Press.
    • Dryzek, John S., David Downes, Christian Hunold, David Schlosberg, and Hans-Kristian Hernes (2003), Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway, Oxford University Press.
    • Dryzek, John S., Bonnie Honig, and Anne Philips (2006), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford University Press.
    • Eckersley, Robyn (1997), Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach, London: UCL Press.
    • Fisher, William F. and Thomas Ponniah (eds.) (2015), Another World Is Possible: World Social Forum for an Alternative Globalization, London: Zed Books.
    • Forsyth, Tim (2003), Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, London: Routledge.
    • Freeden, Michael (2005), Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought, Princeton University Press.
    • Gleeson, Brendan and Nicholas Low (eds.) (2001), Governing for the Environment: Global roblems, Ethics, and Democracy, New York: Palgrave.
    • Hayward, T. (2009), "International Political Theory and the Global Environment: Some Critical Questions for Liberal Cosmopolitans", in Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 276-295.
    • Nightingale, Andrea J. (2017), "Power and Politics in Climate Change Adaptation Efforts: Struggles over Authority and Recognition in the Context of Political Instability", in Geoforum, 84 (2017) 11-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j. geoforum.2017.05.011.
    • Novotny, Patrick (2000), Where We Live, Work and Play: The Environmental Justice Movement and the Struggle for a New Environmentalism, London: Praeger.
    • Pepper, David (1993), Eco-Socialism: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice, London: Routledge.
    • Perreault, Tom, Gavin Bridge, and James McCarthy (eds.) (2015), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, London: Routledge.
    • Robbins, Paul (2012), Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Sandler, Ronald and Phaedra C. Pezzullo (eds.) (2007), Environmental Justice and Environmentalism: The Social Justice Challenge to the Environmental Movement, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Smith, Graham (2003), Deliberative Democracy and the Environment, London: Routledge.
    • Sze, Julie (ed.) (2018), Sustainability: Approaches to Environmental Justice and Social Power, New York University Press.
    • Tam, Kim-Pong (2020), "Understanding the Psychology X Politics Interaction Behind Environmental Activism: The Roles of Governmental Trust, Density of Environmental NGOs, and Democracy", in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71 (2020) 101330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101330.
    • Taylor, Dorceta E. (ed.) (2010), Environment and Social Justice: An International Perspective, Bingley: Emerald.
    • Urwin, Derek and William Paterson (1990), Politics in Western Europe Today: Perspectives, Policies, and Problems since 1980, London: Routledge.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار