<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahid Beheshti University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Political and International Approaches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-739X</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Spinozan Turn in French Political Philosophy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Spinozan Turn in French Political Philosophy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>137</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>146</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">99144</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Najafzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>New controversial interpretations of Spinoza`s Opera Quae&lt;br /&gt;Supersunt Omnia flourished in post second World War years.&lt;br /&gt;During the nineteen century and beginning years of the Twentieth&lt;br /&gt;Spinoza`s metaphysics, ethics and politics were dominated&lt;br /&gt;by a Hobbesian-Hegelian interpretation. Gradually a critical&lt;br /&gt;philosophico-political thought toward Hegel were created in&lt;br /&gt;the twentieth-century French philosophy. A group of French&lt;br /&gt;anti-Hegelian philosophers introduced an alternative interpretation&lt;br /&gt;of Spinozian works, generating a new tradition in Spinozist&lt;br /&gt;readings. Spinozist philosophy faced new dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;This discursive change contradicted with dominant traditions&lt;br /&gt;of French political philosophy. In this article, the author tries&lt;br /&gt;to analyze some faces of transformation of Spinozian reading&lt;br /&gt;and periods of Spinozian interpretation in twentieth-century&lt;br /&gt;French philosophy.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">New controversial interpretations of Spinoza`s Opera Quae&lt;br /&gt;Supersunt Omnia flourished in post second World War years.&lt;br /&gt;During the nineteen century and beginning years of the Twentieth&lt;br /&gt;Spinoza`s metaphysics, ethics and politics were dominated&lt;br /&gt;by a Hobbesian-Hegelian interpretation. Gradually a critical&lt;br /&gt;philosophico-political thought toward Hegel were created in&lt;br /&gt;the twentieth-century French philosophy. A group of French&lt;br /&gt;anti-Hegelian philosophers introduced an alternative interpretation&lt;br /&gt;of Spinozian works, generating a new tradition in Spinozist&lt;br /&gt;readings. Spinozist philosophy faced new dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;This discursive change contradicted with dominant traditions&lt;br /&gt;of French political philosophy. In this article, the author tries&lt;br /&gt;to analyze some faces of transformation of Spinozian reading&lt;br /&gt;and periods of Spinozian interpretation in twentieth-century&lt;br /&gt;French philosophy.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Seventieth Century Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Spinozian Thought</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Radical Thought</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Metaphysics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Political Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">French Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Immanentism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://piaj.sbu.ac.ir/article_99144_14b49af4916c710885fd52868be85ec0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
