The foundation of John Rawls’ theory of justice is how to choose two principles of justice in a manner that the parties of dialogue reduce the level of their mistakes at least possible in their choices. Biased upon the theoretical principles in rational choices, deliberative rationality in particular, and also choosing constructivism- contrary to teleological and intuitional approaches which circumscribe options in the realm of right- Rawls makes an attempt to open path to a rational choice. Hence, rational, free and equal persons, choose the principles of justice through a considered dialogue with each other, and also with their yokefellows. In this research, I have used the methodology of conceptual analysis and critical evaluation on the basis of analytical philosophy. In this article, the core of the argument is that how and in which manner, Rawls’ deliberative rationality ends to an agreement among citizens. After the assessment of above-mentioned principle, the deliberative rationality in particular to attain a choice, the outcome of the research is access of citizens to agreement through thoughtful dialogue in order to solve macro social and political problems. In this regard, Rawls’ logical and well-organized theory as a strong philosophical support, increases the capacities and possibilities of effective dialogue, and eventually possible achievement to common fundamental agreements.
Bullock, Alan; Stallybrass, Oliver. (1986). The Fontana Dictionary of Mother Thought, London: Fontana/Collins.
Daniels, Norman. (1985). Reading Rawls, Critical Studies of A Theory of Justice, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Horton, John. (1986). Political Philosophy and Politics, Adrian Leftwich (ed.), What is Politics?, The Activity and its Study, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mulhall, Stephen; Swift, Adam. (1995). Liberals and Communitarian, Oxford, Blackwell.
Oakeshott, Michael. (1983). The Activity of Historian, in Preston King (ed.). The History of Ideas, London, Croom Helm.
Popkin, H. Richard; Avrum Stroll. (1998). Philosophy, New Revised Edition, London, Heinemann.
Raphael, D. D. (1983). Problems of Political Philosophy, Revised Edition, London: MacMillan.
Rawls, John. (1986). A Theory of Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. (1993). Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.
Sandel, Michael. (1987). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Saward Michael. (2002). Rawls and Deliberative Democracy, Maurizio Passerin D’Entreves (ed.). Democracy as Public Deliberation: new perspectives, Manchester and New York, Manchester University Press, pp.112-130.
Walzer, Michael. (1990). A Critique of Philosophical Conversation, The Philosophical Forum, vol. 21,pp. 182–196.
White, Angela D. (2012). A Rawlsian Idea of Deliberative Democracy, a PhD Thesis, Angela Dawn White 2011 School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Scholarship@Western.
Mahmoudi, S. A. (2019). An Evaluation of Status and Output of “Deliberative Rationality “in Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Political and International Approaches, 10(4), 124-145.
MLA
Seyed Ali Mahmoudi. "An Evaluation of Status and Output of “Deliberative Rationality “in Rawls’ Theory of Justice". Political and International Approaches, 10, 4, 2019, 124-145.
HARVARD
Mahmoudi, S. A. (2019). 'An Evaluation of Status and Output of “Deliberative Rationality “in Rawls’ Theory of Justice', Political and International Approaches, 10(4), pp. 124-145.
VANCOUVER
Mahmoudi, S. A. An Evaluation of Status and Output of “Deliberative Rationality “in Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Political and International Approaches, 2019; 10(4): 124-145.
)